THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL AND PROPAGANDA FILMS BASED ON OUT OF DATE EVOLUTIONIST SUPPOSITIONS
THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL AND PROPAGANDA
FILMS BASED ON OUT OF DATE EVOLUTIONIST
SUPPOSITIONS
Recently the Discovery channel went on air with
a new ape-man propaganda documentary called "Hunt or Be Hunted" in
which, once more, actors dressed up as so-called hominids featured. Scenes depicting
prey flesh being carved up by blood stained hands holding primitive stone knifes,
flesh being carried to a cave, cooked on fire and then being eaten by ape-men,
making strange sounds coming from the throat, followed one another. The "ancestors"
of man were presented as primitive beings, devoid of consciousness, living between
300,000 and 40,000 years ago. The program was proposing that stone tools and
resin-fuelled torches were discovered by coincidence and it related the story
of Homo erectus and Neanderthal man. It was claimed that Homo erectus, a ferocious
predator, probably communicated by primitive vocal sounds although it was not
clear whether they were capable of speech. Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, despite
having adapted to the climatic conditions of ice age Europe, lost out to Homo
sapiens sapiens in the struggle for the continuation of the species we were
told. The Discovery channel totally disregarded the fact that those beings had
in reality the anatomy of man. It obtained the ape-man view by entering the
world of imagination in order to dress up the bones to fit the purpose and accompanied
the product with its biased commentary.
The distinguishing feature of this documentary separating it from
others on the subject of imaginary ape-men was that it didn’t bother with
providing any information on the anatomical features of the species or the key
archeological discoveries used to identify them. It just related the lifestyle
of ape-men with the intention to plant the view of man being a highly developed
ape into the minds of the viewer. The program featured ape-men called by names
like "Dough", "Sear" and "Hog" in action packed
scenes of the hunt of bison and giant deer and their migration through forests
in deep snow. Unusually, the views of evolutionist scientists was not sought
in support of the subject matter in the program and the whole thing was just
an uncomplicated and free flowing propaganda film.
It was clearly aiming to manipulate the mind and to imprint the
scenes of ape-men there rather than to investigate the myth of human evolution
in the light of scientific data. The Discovery channel acknowledged the species
shown in the scenarios of human evolution to be ape-men without perceiving the
need to examine their anatomy and expected the viewer to blindly believe its
Darwinist predispositions.
All the scenarios shown on the Discovery channel were scientifically
unsustainable and were no more than an unprofessional show aiming to mislead,
because the Homo erectus and Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
were real humans even though the TV channel’s Darwinist bias portrayed
them as primitive and wild creatures.
Scientific research revealed that there are no differences between
the skeleton of Homo erectus and that of modern man and that the anatomical
distinctions of Homo erectus go no further than the variations between
the different races of today’s human species. It is against scientific
facts to portray Neanderthal man as a primitive creature. Even renowned evolutionists
are admitting nowadays that there are no significant differences between Homo
erectus and Homo sapiens, that the Homo erectus is an
imaginary category and that it should be considered as a variation of Homo
sapiens. Neanderthal man was a real member of the human species with his
culture and faculty of abstract thought no different than his contemporary,
Homo sapiens.
The Discovery channel ought to accept this scientifically
proven fact and shelve its propaganda films based on obsolete evolutionist scenarios.